Dynamics Control of Judge in Indonesia by the Supreme Court and Commission Yudisal

Akbar Kurnia Putra, Munawir ., Dani Ramdani


The Supreme Court and the Judicial commission designed to cooperate in the field of supervision of judges. In reality, the cooperation between both institutions considered not running optimally, due to the emergence of differences of opinion on a purely technical breach judicial ethics in understanding the principles being disciplined and professional principles in the code of conduct and guidelines for behavior of judges. The problem up to now not resolved completely, although the Supreme Court and the Commission have set a rule Yudisal together in 2012 on the enforcement of ethical codes and guidelines Code of Conduct judges. Such conditions can cause impacts ineffective oversight of judges, so that the reform of the judicial authority is not reached. In conducting surveillance of judges, the Supreme Court and the Judicial Commission should establish a partnership, not a relationship that tends confrontational. Non-confrontational partnership can be realized which can include the Chairman of the Judicial Commission chaired ex-officio by the Chief Justice.

Keywords: Dynamics, supervision of judges, the Supreme Court, the Judicial Commission.

Full Text: PDF
Download the IISTE publication guideline!

To list your conference here. Please contact the administrator of this platform.

Paper submission email: JLPG@iiste.org

ISSN (Paper)2224-3240 ISSN (Online)2224-3259

Please add our address "contact@iiste.org" into your email contact list.

This journal follows ISO 9001 management standard and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Copyright © www.iiste.org