Damages Awards in International Investment Arbitration and the Question of Fair Compensation

Abstract

When an arbitral agreement freely entered into between a host nation and a financially stronger multilateral foreign organization breaks down, arbitration is the acceptable mode of settlement of the disagreement. This is in line with the Nigerian Arbitration and Conciliation Act, which makes applicable the convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards (New York Convention) on awards made in Nigeria arising out of international commercial arbitration. The objective of this paper is to seek a balance between protecting foreign investments and shielding the economies of host States from destruction through award of excessive damages. The doctrinal approach of qualitative research methodology was adopted, which enabled the interrogation of previous literature that deals with the issue of fair compensation and the role equity should play in international investment arbitration. This library-based research focused on analysing primary data such as cases, statutes and conventions and secondary data in text form. The research methodology adopted helped describe and contributed to the understanding of the concept of damages awards in international investment arbitration and the place of equity in awarding damages. The paper concludes that applying equitable principles will help arbitral tribunals arrive at more appropriate equitable damages based on fair compensation. The implication of the study is that international investment arbitration tribunals may intentionally take into account the actual amount of money invested or expended towards a project in quantifying damages thereby endeavouring not to cross the line of fair compensation.

Keywords:Damages awards, Equitable principles, Fair compensation, International investment arbitration, Justice

DOI: 10.7176/JLPG/81-02

Publication date: November 30^th 2022