Advocating the Unconstitutionality of Laws and Regulations Before the Regular Judiciary

Abstract

It should be noted that this study will deal with research and analysis is one of the most important legal issues is to push the unconstitutionality of laws and regulations before the regular judiciary as this study aims to determine the concept of pushing unconstitutional and procedures and controls to exercise this right to pay.Legislation varied between countries in regulating the methods of judicial control over the constitutionality of laws and regulations, where part of the legislation went to limit this control through the original case, which may be exercised either by specific authorities in the state only or by allowing individuals to bring this case directly before the court In addition to the original lawsuit, the lawsuit was taken by one of the litigants in connection with a case before the Court of First Instance, while others turned to a direct approach to censorship of unconstitutionality either by addressing the Constitutional Court with suspicion. L Direct exercise of this control or direct response by the court of first instance.The Jordanian legislator, through the constitutional amendment and after the establishment of a constitutional court competent to control the constitutionality of laws and regulations under the law of the Constitutional Court, has specified ways to initiate the constitutional lawsuit, which is either through the original lawsuit and initiated by specific authorities in the state without allowing individuals to initiate, or be through payment By one of the litigants in connection with a lawsuit either the judiciary.

Keywords: payment, constitutionality of laws, regulations, regular judiciary.

DOI: 10.7176/JLPG/90-09

Publication date:October 31^st 2019