An Evaluation of the Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) in Enugu State, Nigeria

Akubue Augustine Uchenna, Jalal-Eddeen Abubakar Saleh, Abdullahi Saddiq, Mpazanje Rex, Alemu Wondimagegnehu, Okoro Linus Eze, Izegbune Angela Anwagom, Ukor Nkiruka Calista, Ogboi Sonny Johnbull, Anthony Oketah Chinedu, Isaiah Abonyi, Ekweremadu Isaac Dinwe, Ossai Okechukwu, Amadi Ngwa Agwu

Abstract


Background: The Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR), adopted in 1988 at the 48th World Health Organization Regional Committee for Africa meeting in Harare, Zimbabwe, is a regional strategy to strengthen the weak national surveillance systems in the region. In Nigeria, and prior 1988, there was no coordinated system of disease reporting and surveillance system in place until after a major yellow fever outbreak in 1986/87 that claimed many lives. The IDSR in Enugu state, as supported by the WHO, has 17 disease surveillance and notification officers across the 17 LGAs and 89 reporting sites covering the 3000 health facilities.

Method: This study is a prospective cross-sectional study using WHO and CDC assessment protocols modified to reflect the local settings. The study samples were selected based on the IDSR performance indicators for AFP, measles core indicators, status of epidemic-prone diseases, and adequacy of feedback and feedforward of surveillance activities. Using desk review of the EPI/IDSR surveillance reports between 2012 and 2017, and also questionnaires between April and July 2017 to eligible participants, data were obtained, cleaned, and analysed using the SPSS version 24.

Results: The Overall average score of IDSR performance indicator for Enugu state from the pooled data was 39% against the expected of >80%. These findings are in disagreement with the globally recommended standard IDSR practice and response.

Conclusion: The outcome of this study highlights that Enugu state surveillance and IDSR practice are short of the standard practice as prescribed by WHO and CDC assessment protocols. Main reasons for this include poor disease reporting, poor documentation of conducted activities, and lack of adequate feedback system. Similarly, there is non-involvement of community and private health facilities that made up more than 95% of surveillance networks in the state. However, global polio eradication initiative and change management approaches identified remain a huge opportunity for the improvement of the system.

Keywords: Enugu State, IDSR, AFP, Measles, Outbreaks, Yellow Fever, Nigeria, WHO, CDC.

 


Full Text: PDF
Download the IISTE publication guideline!

To list your conference here. Please contact the administrator of this platform.

Paper submission email: JHMN@iiste.org

ISSN 2422-8419

Please add our address "contact@iiste.org" into your email contact list.

This journal follows ISO 9001 management standard and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Copyright © www.iiste.org