Electoral Corruption: The Case of the 2005 Election in Liberia
Abstract
There is a widespread public perception of corruption in Liberia’s election process, yet little documentation exists on the characteristics of voters and their perceptions of electoral corruption. The purpose of this correlational study was to explore the relationship between gender, ethnicity, physical location, and perceptions about political activity during the 2005 national election. This is essential because election is the method citizens’ use for removing incompetent leaders or retaining qualified leaders. Stated differently, democratic accountability is the only leverage citizens have to minimize leaders’ corrupt behaviors, foster effective provision of public services, and ensure that leaders perform their responsibilities. These factors make it necessary for Liberia’s electoral process to be free of patronage, corruption, and conflict of interest. Roderick Chisolm’s conceptualization of the internalist view of justification served as the theoretical construct. Data were acquired from the Afrobarometer survey (n = 1,200), which used a representative cross-sectional sample design, and were subjected to cross-tabulation analysis, a chi-square test, and a correlation analysis. The results of the analysis indicated that elections were perceived as unfair and that gender was an important predictor of perception. The analysis revealed that 26.8% of women perceived the National Election Commission as untrustworthy and 79.0% reported that they did not feel completely free to choose their preferred candidate. A chi-square test of association confirmed that among males, the belief that elections are free and fair was statistically significant (p = .002), though not for females (p = .151). Gender was moderately correlated (r = .088) with corruption of government officials. The analysis also found that the theoretical construct may explain the behavior of elected officials, but was not predictive of voter engagement. Recommendations to remedy this problem include widespread election reform that focuses on combating negative perceptions of voters, particularly among women, and correcting technical irregularities in Liberia’s electoral processes.
Keywords: Liberia’s 2005 election, Government, Corruption, Election commission, democracy
To list your conference here. Please contact the administrator of this platform.
Paper submission email: PPAR@iiste.org
ISSN (Paper)2224-5731 ISSN (Online)2225-0972
Please add our address "contact@iiste.org" into your email contact list.
This journal follows ISO 9001 management standard and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Copyright © www.iiste.org